Abstract
Abstract Missing rainfall data can cause the results of an analysis to be inaccurate. This study aims to compare the performance of different methods in estimating missing rainfall data and to evaluate the estimated missing rainfall data method on hydrograph estimation. The methods used to estimate missing rainfall data in three selected stations include the arithmetic mean (AM) method, the inverse squared distance (ISD) method, and replacing missing value with zero value (ZERO). The study employs root mean square error (RMSE) to assess the accuracy and reliability of the methods. The estimated rainfall data are then utilized in Stormwater Management Modelling Software 5 (SWMM5) to evaluate the data impact on the discharge estimation. The results indicated that the AM method is the best method to estimate missing rainfall data by considering the lowest RMSE value equal to 1.185. In conclusion, the comparison of missing rainfall data methods in this study has shed light on their performance in enhancing discharge estimation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
