Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the miniaturised techniques, capillary electrochromatography (CEC) and capillary liquid chromatography (CLC), for the chiral separation of chlorthalidone. In both cases, hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin was used as a chiral selector in the mobile phase, while an achiral stationary phase was used. Earlier, this separation was already optimised in CEC. Now, the separation was optimised in CLC. The influence of the organic modifier content and the cyclodextrin concentration on the separation was studied by means of a central composite design. Optimal separation conditions were determined, after response modelling, from the response surface contour plots. When these conditions were compared with those of the CEC optimisation, we can see the potential of using CLC as a chiral separation technique since less chiral selector was used, faster separations were obtained and better repeatability was observed in comparison with its electrical-driven counterpart.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
