Comparison of the long-term outcomes of total arthroplasty and anterior spinal fusion in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease: a metaanalysis

Abstract

The study aim was to perform a meta-analysis based on the results of randomized clinical trials comparing long-term outcomes of total intervertebral disc arthroplasty (TA) and anterior cervical spinal fusion (ACSF) in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, ELibrary, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials reported between 2008 and August 2018. The relative risk and 95% confidence interval were calculated for dichotomous variables; for continuous variables, we used the standardized mean difference and their 95% CI with application of a random effects model. The metaanalysis involved 9 randomized controlled clinical trials including the long-term outcomes of surgical treatment in 2,439 patients. A pooled analysis of the data showed that regression of neurological symptoms (p<0.00001), improvement in the quality of life of patients (Neck Disability Index), and lower pain severity (visual analogue scale for upper extremities) were significantly more often observed (p=0.02) in the group of TA patients. In addition, the TA technique was characterized by a statistically significantly lower rate of re-surgery (p<0.0005) and degeneration of the superjacent segment (p<0.0001), with the rate of adverse events being slightly increased (p=0.04). Compared to anterior cervical spinal fusion, TA of cervical intervertebral discs is characterized by significantly better clinical efficacy in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease in the long-term postoperative follow-up.