Abstract
AbstractIn the X‐ray fluorescence analysis of steels, a correction method is usually used so as to eliminate interfering spectrum overlap and absorption–enhancement effects. In correcting the former, the intensity correction method, by which measured x‐ray intensity is corrected, is widely used. In the JIS method of x‐ray fluorescence analysis of steels, however, the measured x‐ray intensity is first converted into a tentative analytical value, and this value is then corrected for absorption–enhancement effects and finally for interfering spectrum overlap. In this report, a detailed comparison of both methods is made, and the characteristics of the JIS method are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
