Abstract
Previous investigations have suggested that conical and cylindrical pedicle screws have comparable holding strengths. So far, the remaining performance in screws turned back or loose as a result of other reasons has not been determined. Twenty-four cadaveric spines from 6- to 8-week-old calves were examined. After bone mineral density was determined, four pedicle screws (two conical and two cylindrical screws) were inserted. The screws were fully inserted and half of them turned back 180 degrees. Twenty-four axial pullout and 24 cyclic loading tests with subsequent pullout tests were conducted. The pullout strengths of conical screws turned back 180 degrees are significantly smaller (1.8 kN) than those of cylindrical screws (4.3 kN). After cyclic loading, the displacement of conical screws is significantly greater (6.9 mm) than that of cylindrical screws (4.7 mm). Pedicle screws, especially conical ones, need to be placed to a correct depth, and they should not have to be backed out.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
