Comparison of the iCare, Tono-Pen, non-contact airpuff, and Goldmann applanation tonometers in eyes with corneal edema after penetrating keratoplasty.

Abstract

To compare the utility of the iCare, Tono-Pen, and non-contact airpuff (NCT) tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with corneal edema after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and to assess the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature (CC) on IOP measurements. Thirty-two eyes of 27 patients with corneal edema after PKP due to corneal abnormalities and 43 control eyes of 30 patients with normal corneas were recruited. Before IOP measurements, all patients underwent a baseline examination, including auto-refraction, keratometry, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and CCT measurement. IOP was measured using the devices in the same order: first the NCT, followed by the iCare, Tono-Pen, and GAT. The differences between the iCare, Tono-Pen, NCT, and GAT were calculated with repeated-measures analysis of variance. The Bland-Altman method was used to assess the agreement between the iCare, Tono-Pen, and NCT versus the GAT. The influences of CCT and CC on IOP measurement were evaluated by correlation analysis using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Mean IOP measurements were significantly higher with the NCT and Tono-Pen than with the GAT in the PKP and control groups. When compared with GAT, iCare showed significantly higher IOP readings in the control group, but the IOP readings did not differ between the iCare and GAT in the PKP group. Poor agreement was noted between the NCT and GAT in both groups. The Tono-Pen showed clinically acceptable agreement with GAT in control eyes and poor agreement in PKP eyes. The agreement between the iCare and GAT appeared to be clinically acceptable in both groups. Correlation analysis of the results from control eyes showed that the IOP measurements with the GAT and NCT were weakly related to CCT and moderately correlated with CC. The iCare IOP readings were weakly correlated with CCT and CC. In the PKP group, the NCT and Tono-Pen significantly overestimated IOP, whereas the iCare IOP readings were similar to those obtained using the GAT. Poor agreement was noted between the NCT and GAT as well as between the Tono-Pen and GAT, but the iCare showed clinically acceptable agreement with GAT. In normal corneas, the GAT, NCT, and iCare were affected by CCT and CC. The iCare tonometer was less affected by corneal edema than were the NCT and the Tono-Pen. The iCare appears to be a useful device for IOP measurement in eyes with corneal edema after PKP.