Comparison of the geriatric nutritional risk index and the prognostic nutritional index in determining survival outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing surgical resection: A cohort study.

Abstract

To assess the clinical feasibility of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as determinants of survival in patients with stage I to III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective study included patients with stage I to III NSCLC from all age groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Cox regression analysis. The concordance index (C-index) of the models was evaluated following the establishment of the prognostic models for survival. The median patient age was 69 years, and 64.6% of the patients were male. In total, 172 (65.4%) patients were classified as having stage I disease, 52 (19.8%) as stage II disease, and 39 (14.8%) as stage III disease. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, the HRs of GNRI for OS, CSS, and RFS were 0.37 (P = .003), 0.47 (P = .041), and 0.38 (P < .001), respectively. However, the HRs of the PNI for survival outcomes were not statistically significant. Overall, age, sex, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, pleural invasion (PI), and GNRI were significant determinants of OS and constituted the OS model (concordance index [C-index], 0.824). In addition, age, TNM stage, PI, and GNRI were significant determinants of CSS and constituted the CSS model (C-index, 0.828). Finally, TNM stage, PI, lymphatic invasion, and GNRI were significant determinants of RFS and constituted the RFS model (C-index, 0.783). Our study showed that GNRI, but not PNI, was a predictor of OS, CSS, and RFS in patients with stage I-III NSCLC across all age groups. Excellent discriminant power was observed for OS, CSS, and RFS models.