Abstract

Combining risk factors for prostate cancer into a predictive tool may improve the detection of prostate cancer while decreasing the number of benign biopsies. We compare one such tool, age multiplied by prostate volume divided by total serum PSA (PSA-AV) with PSA density and detection of primary malignant circulating prostate cells (CPCs) in a Chilean prostate cancer screening program. The objectives were not only to determine the predictive values of each, but to determine the number of clinically significant cancers that would have been detected or missed. A prospective study was conducted of all men undergoing 12 core ultrasound guided prostate biopsy for suspicion of cancer attending the Hospital DIPRECA and Hospital de Carabineros de Chile. Total serum PSA was registered, prostate volumecalculated at the moment of biopsy, and an 8 ml blood simple taken immediately before the biopsy procedure. Mononuclear cells were obtained from the blood simple using differential gel centrifugation and CPCs identified using immunocytchemistry with anti- PSA and anti-P504S. Biopsy results were classed as positive or negative for cancer and if positive the Gleason score, number of positive cores and percent infiltration recorded. A total of 664 men participated, of whom 234 (35.2%) had cancer detected. They were older, had higher mean PSA, PSA density and lower PSA-AV. Detection of CPCs had high predictive score, sensitivity, sensibility and positive and negative predictive values, PSA-AV was not significantly different from PSA density in this population. The use of CPC detection avoided more biopsies and missed fewer significant cancers. In this screening population the use of CPC detection predicted the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer better than the other parameters. The high negative predictive value would allow men CPC negative to avoid biopsy but remain in follow up. The formula PSA-AV did not add to the predictive performance using PSA density.

Highlights

  • Today, a new diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) nearly always occurs following a patient referral for prostate biopsy (PB) as a result of an increased PSA

  • We compare one such tool, age multiplied by prostate volume divided by total serum PSA (PSA-AV) with PSA density and detection of primary malignant circulating prostate cells (CPCs) in a Chilean prostate cancer screening program

  • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 16, 2015 5365 factor for race. They found that a cut off value of 700 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 35% respectively and performed better than a total serum PSA >4.0ng/ml. This formula can be re-defined as age divided by prostate density; we present our findings of a Chilean population of men referred from a prostate cancer screening program for a prostate biopsy on the grounds of suspicion of prostate cancer as a result of an elevated serum total PSA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A new diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) nearly always occurs following a patient referral for prostate biopsy (PB) as a result of an increased PSA. PSA is currently the only biomarker used for prostate cancer screening; of men aged 50-70 years 10-20% will have a raised PSA and of men with a PSA of 4-10ng/ml the probability of a positive initial biopsy is approximately 25% (Smith et al, 1997). Combining risk factors for prostate cancer into a predictive tool may improve the detection of prostate cancer while decreasing the number of benign biopsies. We compare one such tool, age multiplied by prostate volume divided by total serum PSA (PSA-AV) with PSA density and detection of primary malignant circulating prostate cells (CPCs) in a Chilean prostate cancer screening program. The formula PSA-AV did not add to the predictive performance using PSA density

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call