Abstract
Introduction. From late 19th century to the present day, several authors have investigated the value of low eosinophil count as a biomarker of bacterial infection. In this study, we examined the value of eosinopenia for diagnosing bacterial infection in ill-appearing children admitted to the pediatric emergency department.Methods. Retrospective review of the medical records of children age 1 month to 14 years who appeared ill on admission to the emergency department (ED). Data collected included; C-reactive protein (CRP) level leukocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil counts, results of microbiological tests, radiologic evaluation, and treatment given in the ED. Final outcome data were also collected. Results. In total, 878 met our case definition and inclusion criteria. 521 patients had confirmed or presumed bacterial infection and 355 patients had presumed or confirmed viral infection. Nineteen patients died; all had bacterial infections. Neutrophil, eosinophil counts and CRP level were independent risk factors for bacterial infection in the multivariate analysis (p 0.05). The sensitivities of the leukocyte, neutrophil, and eosinophil counts and CRP level were 57.5%, 62.9%, 61%, and 57.1%, respectively. The specificities of them were 59.1%, 63.3%, 67%, and 77.4%, respectively.Conclusion. In our study population, although the accuracies of eosinophil, neutrophil counts, and CRP level were not enough, they had similar in distinguishing viral from bacterial infection in ill appearing febrile children. By comparison the leukocyte count had limited predictive value.
Highlights
From late 19th century to the present day, several authors have investigated the value of low eosinophil count as a biomarker of bacterial infection
The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves analysis for discriminating bacterial and viral infection showed that the eosinophil count (≤50 cells/μL) was similar to the neutrophil count (AUROC 0.655; 95% CI: 0,622-0.686), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level (AUROC 0.710; 0.678-0.740) (p>0.05)
The accuracies of eosinophil, neutrophil counts, and CRP level were not enough, they had similar in distinguishing viral from bacterial infection in ill appearing febrile children
Summary
From late 19th century to the present day, several authors have investigated the value of low eosinophil count as a biomarker of bacterial infection. We examined the value of eosinopenia for diagnosing bacterial infection in ill-appearing children admitted to the pediatric emergency department. It is not always easy to differentiate between bacterial and viral infections in the emergency department. C-reactive protein (CRP) and the leukocyte and neutrophil counts are the acute-phase reactants used most widely in children admitted to the emergency department with a high fever. [4] no perfect acute-phase reactant can differentiate between bacterial and viral infections with 100% accuracy. We want to compare the role of the eosinophil count to the roles of leukocyte count, neutrophil count, and serum CRP level for distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections in ill-appearing children with fever admitted to the emergency department
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
