Abstract
In order to fully understand the dependence of device electroluminescence (EL) on the chemical structure of two light-emitting materials: 1,2,3,4-tetraphenyl-1,3-cyclopentadiene (TPCP) and 1,2,3,4,5-pentaphenyl-1,3-cyclopentadiene (PPCP), their properties in solution and as evaporated thin films of UV-Vis absorption, geometric structures, photoluminescence (PL), electrochemistry, glass transition temperature and EL were compared. Compared with that of TPCP, the first absorption band of PPCP shifts to the shorter wavelength region both in solution and thin film state; the photoluminescence in solution exhibits lower quantum efficiency but in thin film state has a higher intensity; the electrochemical oxidation happens at a higher potential; the solid powder exhibits higher glass transition temperature; and the electroluminescent device shows higher luminescence and efficiency. Reasons responsible for the differences were analyzed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
