Comparison of the Efficacy of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid Versus Topical 4% Hydroquinone in Treating Melasma.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intralesional tranexamic acid and topical 4% hydroquinone in the treatment of melasma.Study design: This comparative prospective study was conducted at the Dermatology Department, Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan from October 16, 2018 to April 16, 2019.Methodology: A total of 290 patients with melasma, 18 to 50 years of age, were included in this study. Patients with a history of discoid lupus erythematosus, pregnancy, lactation, anemia, and oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy were excluded from the study. Randomization was 1:1 for groups A and B, i.e., each upcoming patient was included in the next group. This randomization was supervised by another clinician. One hundred forty-five patients were placed in group A (intralesional tranexamic acid), while 145 were enrolled in group B (topical 4% hydroquinone). Follow-up was done at four weekly intervals for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, the final response was assessed.Results: In group A, the average age was 33.74 ± 6.67 years, while in group B it was 32.08 ± 6.08 years. Among the entire patients, the majority of the patients, 207 (71.38%), were in the age range of 18 to 35 years. Intralesional tranexamic acid was efficacious in 64 (44.14%) patients, while 47 (32.41%) of group B (topical 4% hydroquinone) showed complete improvement (p-value = 0.040).Conclusion: This study concluded that using intralesional tranexamic acid is more effective in treating melasma than topical 4% hydroquinone.