Comparison of the efficacy for early warning systems in predicting obstetric critical illness

Abstract

ObjectiveTo validate the accuracy of four early warning scores for early identification of women at risk. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of pregnant women admitted in obstetrics Critical Care Unit (ICU). Capacity of the Modified Obstetric Early Warning Score (MOEWS), ICNARC Obstetric Early Warning Score (OEWS), Maternal Early Obstetric Warning System (MEOWS chart), and Maternal Early Warning Trigger (MEWT) were compared in predicting severe maternal morbidity. Area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive performance of scoring system. ResultsA total of 352 pregnant women were enrolled and 290 were identified with severe maternal morbidity. MOEWS was more sensitive than MEOWS chart, ICNARC OEWS and MEWT (96.9 % vs. 83.4 %, 66.6 % and 44.8 %). MEWT had the highest specificity (98.4 %), followed by MOEWS (83.9 %), ICNARC OEWS (75.8 %) and MEOWS chart (48.4 %). AUROC of MOEWS, ICNARC OEWS, MEOWS chart, and MEWT for prediction of maternal mortality were 0.91 (95 % CI: 0.874–0.945), 0.765(95 % CI: 0.71–0.82), 0.657(95 % CI: 0.577–0.738), and 0.716 (95 % CI, 0.659–0.773) respectively. MOEWS had the highest AUCs in the discrimination of serious complications in hypertensive disorders, cardiovascular disease, obstetric hemorrhage and infection. For individual vital signs, maximum diastolic blood pressure (DBP), maximum systolic blood pressure (SBP), maximum respiratory rate (RR) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2) demonstrated greater predictive ability. ConclusionMOEWS is more accurate than ICNARC OEWS, MEOWS chart, and MEWT in predicting the deterioration of women. The prediction ability of DBP, SBP, RR and SPO2 are more reliable.