Abstract

To compare the long-term effects of 3 different anti-VEGF molecules on the lens, cornea and anterior chamber in phakic patients who have received consecutive intravitreal injections. 157 patients who did not have corneal pathology but were treated with 1.25mg/0.05ml intravitreal bevacizumab, 0.5mg/0.5ml ranibizumab or 2mg/0.05ml aflibercept injections due to diabetic macular edema were retrospectively analyzed in our clinic. Patients who received three consecutive monthly injections were included to the study. Corneal thickness, lens thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements which were taken before the injections, 1 month after the first injection, 1 month after the second injection, and 1 month after the third injection were used in the study. There was no statistical difference between the bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept and control group in terms of preoperative specifications such as number of patients, gender and age average. A statistically significant difference was found between the 4 anterior chamber depth measurements in the control group, Ranibizumab drug group, and Bevacizumab and Aflibercept drug groups (p<0.001, p=0.026; p=0.07, p<0.001, respectively). Anterior chamber depth of the Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab patients decreased in the first month and increased in the second and third months. However, anterior chamber depth of the Aflibercept patients increased over time. As a result of our study; we concluded that three different anti- VEGF drug molecules have an effect on the anterior camera.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.