Comparison of the correlations between impact loading rates and peak accelerations measured at two different body sites: Intra- and inter-subject analysis

Abstract

BackgroundHigh average (VALR) and instantaneous vertical loading rates (VILR) during impact have been associated with many running-related injuries. Peak acceleration (PA), measured with an accelerometer, has provided an alternative method to estimate impact loading during outdoor running. This study sought to compare both intra- and inter-subject correlations between vertical loading rates and PA measured at two body sites during running. MethodsGround reaction force data were collected from 10 healthy adults (age=23.6±3.8 years) during treadmill running at different speeds and inclination surfaces. Concurrently, PAs at the lateral malleoli and the distal tibia were measured using synchronized accelerometers. ResultsWe found significant positive intra-subject correlation between loading rates and PA at the lateral malleoli (r=0.561–0.950, p<0.001) and the distal tibia (r=0.486–0.913, p<0.001). PA measured at the lateral malleoli showed stronger correlation with loading rates (p=0.004) than the measurement at the distal tibia. On the other hand, inter-subject variances were observed in the association between PA and vertical loading rates. The inter-subject variances at the distal tibia were 3.88±3.09BW/s and 5.69±3.05BW/s in VALR and VLIR respectively. Similarly, the inter-subject variances in the measurement at lateral malleoli were 5.24±2.85BW/s and 6.67±2.83BW/s in VALR and VLIR respectively. ConclusionsPA measured at lateral malleoli has stronger correlation with VALR or VILR than the measurement at distal tibia. Caution is advised when using PA to conduct inter-subject comparisons of vertical loading rates during running.