Abstract

We compare the core-collapse evolution of a pair of 15.8 M ☉ stars with significantly different internal structures, a consequence of the bimodal variability exhibited by massive stars during their late evolutionary stages. The 15.78 and 15.79 M ☉ progenitors have core masses (masses interior to an entropy of 4 k B baryon−1) of 1.47 and 1.78 M ☉ and compactness parameters ξ 1.75 of 0.302 and 0.604, respectively. The core-collapse simulations are carried out in 2D to nearly 3 s postbounce and show substantial differences in the times of shock revival and explosion energies. The 15.78 M ☉ model begins exploding promptly at 120 ms postbounce when a strong density decrement at the Si–Si/O shell interface, not present in the 15.79 M ☉ progenitor, encounters the stalled shock. The 15.79 M ☉ model takes 100 ms longer to explode but ultimately produces a more powerful explosion. Both the larger mass accretion rate and the more massive core of the 15.79 M ☉ model during the first 0.8 s postbounce time result in larger ν e / luminosities and RMS energies along with a flatter and higher-density heating region. The more-energetic explosion of the 15.79 M ☉ model resulted in the ejection of twice as much 56Ni. Most of the ejecta in both models are moderately proton rich, though counterintuitively the highest electron fraction (Y e = 0.61) ejecta in either model are in the less-energetic 15.78 M ☉ model, while the lowest electron fraction (Y e = 0.45) ejecta in either model are in the 15.79 M ☉ model.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.