Comparison of the compressive mechanical properties of auricular and costal cartilage from patients with microtia

Abstract

Children born with a small or absent ears undergo surgical reconstruction to restore their auricle. Currently, rib (costal) cartilage is used to carve the auricle. However as alternative, tissue engineered and synthetic materials are being developed to restore the auricle shape to overcome donor site morbidity and limited availability of rib cartilage. However, to date there is limited knowledge regarding the mechanical properties of the auricular and costal cartilage to optimise the required compressive properties of the graft. The remnant auricular and costal cartilage from 20 patients undergoing stage-1 microtia surgery was harvested. On the day of surgery, the cartilage was evaluated in compression, with each sample loaded to 300 g at 1 mm/s. ResultsThe costal cartilage was observed to have a significantly higher Young’s Elastic Modulus than auricular cartilage (average costal cartilage 11.43 MPa vs average auricular cartilage 2 MPa, p < 0.0001). The auricular cartilage showed a significantly higher relaxation rate than costal cartilage (average costal cartilage 0.72 MPa10-4 vs average auricular cartilage 1.93 MPa10-4, p < 0.05). The final absolute relaxation was significantly lower for elastic cartilage than costal cartilage (average costal cartilage 3.35 MPa vs average auricular cartilage 0.2 MPa, p < 0.0001). Alloplastic cartilage replacements used as alternatives for reconstruction were also evaluated. Silicone, Gore-Tex and Medpor were observed to have significantly higher Young’s Elastic Modulus than costal and auricular cartilage.Costal cartilage has a higher Young’s Elastic Modulus in compression compared to auricular cartilage. Current synthetic materials used to replace synthetic cartilage do not mimic costal cartilage, which should be addressed in the future.