Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic activation with that of passive sonic activation after hand instrumentation. Sixty curved molar canals were hand-instrumented to size 35 and divided into three groups. Group 1 received no further treatment. Group 2 received 3 min of passive sonic activation. Group 3 received 3 min of passive ultrasonic activation. The roots were split and photomicrographs (x20) were made of the apical 6 mm of canal. A transparent grid was placed over projected images, and the total number of squares covering the apical 6 mm of canal space and the number of squares containing debris were counted. A debris score was calculated for each specimen by dividing the number of squares with debris by the total number of squares. The mean debris scores were 31.6% for hand instrumentation only, 15.1% for the sonic group, and 16.7% for the ultrasonic group. The debris scores for the sonic and ultrasonic activation groups were significantly lower than that for the hand instrumentation only group (p < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference between the sonic and ultrasonic activation groups. Passive sonics after hand instrumentation produces a cleaner canal than hand instrumentation alone and is comparable with that of passive ultrasonics.