Abstract

The impact of the gillnet fishery on Merluccius merluccius (European hake) was investigated in the northern Tyrrhenian Sea, western Mediterranean. Four mesh sizes were tested: 53, 62.5, 70 and 82 mm. Horse mackerel ( Trachurus trachurus ), hake and tub gurnard ( Chelidonichthys lucerna ) dominated the catches, from a minimum of 89% (82 mm mesh) to a maximum of 97.8% (70 mm) of the biomass caught. Efficiency of the four meshes was not significantly different with respect to the total hake catches. Selectivity on M. merluccius was assessed by Sechin and SELECT methods. Tangling was an important catch modality for hake, as evidenced by the results of the Sechin model which described only the first mode of the size distributions corresponding to the entangled specimens. SELECT showed that the bi-modal function gave the best adjustment to the length-frequency distributions; the modal catch sizes were 33, 39.2, 43.6 and 51 cm total length respectively for the 53, 62.5, 70 and 82 mm mesh sizes. Taking into account the size of first maturity for females (35.1 cm TL), 62.5 mm is the most adequate mesh for exploiting hake as it gives some protection to both immature specimens and large females.

Highlights

  • European hake, Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758), is one of the most valuable resources of the Mediterranean fishery

  • Selectivity on M. merluccius was assessed by Sechin and SELECT methods

  • SELECT showed that the bi-modal function gave the best adjustment to the length-frequency distributions; the modal catch sizes were 33, 39.2, 43.6 and 51 cm total length respectively for the 53, 62.5, 70 and 82 mm mesh sizes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758), is one of the most valuable resources of the Mediterranean fishery. According to the data series provided by FAO, a total of 21000 tonnes of hake was landed in this area in 2002 (FAO, 2005). M. merluccius is exploited by trawl, long-line and gill net fleets (Aldebert et al, 1993; Martín et al 1999), even though in many areas most of the landings come from bottom trawl. This type of gear exploits mainly small specimens (Martín et al, 1999), as the large individuals are not as vulnerable. The presence in the trawl landings of bigger specimens is rather infrequent or restricted to certain periods of the year (Sartor et al, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call