Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education

Abstract

BackgroundBOPPPS (bridge-in, learning objective, pretest, participatory learning, posttest, and summary) is a student-centered modular teaching model that improves classroom teaching effectiveness. This study’s primary aim was to explore whether the BOPPPS model has advantages over traditional instructional approaches in teaching lung cancer courses to clinical medical interns.MethodsA total of 88 students majoring in clinical medicine of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong University, who had clinical practice in thoracic surgery from January 2018 to December 2019, were divided into two groups, receiving the same lung cancer teaching content. The experimental group (n = 44) utilized the BOPPPS model, while the control group (n = 44) used the traditional instructional approach. A questionnaire was used to attain the students’ satisfaction and self-evaluation of the course, and a post-study examination was used to assess end-of-course performance.ResultsThe experimental group’s theoretical examination scores with the BOPPPS teaching model were significantly higher than those in the control group. Students preferred the BOPPPS model more than the traditional instructional approach in course satisfaction, student–teacher interaction, learning initiative, analytical ability, clinical thinking ability, and self-study ability (p < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the traditional instructional approach. The BOPPPS model can better inspire clinical medical students’ enthusiasm for thoracic surgery and enhance the students' comprehensive ability. In a word, the BOPPPS model has better teaching effectiveness in the clinical teaching practice of thoracic surgery, which is worthy of reference and popularization.