Abstract

PurposeSuperimposition of two dimensional preoperative and postoperative facial images, including radiographs and photographs, are used to evaluate the surgical changes after orthognathic surgery. Recently, three dimensional (3D) imaging has been introduced allowing more accurate analysis of surgical changes. Surface based registration and voxel based registration are commonly used methods for 3D superimposition. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of the two methods.Materials and methodsPre-operative and 6 months post-operative cone beam CT scan (CBCT) images of 31 patients were randomly selected from the orthognathic patient database at the Dental Hospital and School, University of Glasgow, UK. Voxel based registration was performed on the DICOM images (Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine) using Maxilim software (Medicim-Medical Image Computing, Belgium). Surface based registration was performed on the soft and hard tissue 3D models using VRMesh (VirtualGrid, Bellevue City, WA). The accuracy of the superimposition was evaluated by measuring the mean value of the absolute distance between the two 3D image surfaces. The results were statistically analysed using a paired Student t-test, ANOVA with post-hoc Duncan test, a one sample t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient test.ResultsThe results showed no significant statistical difference between the two superimposition methods (p<0.05). However surface based registration showed a high variability in the mean distances between the corresponding surfaces compared to voxel based registration, especially for soft tissue. Within each method there was a significant difference between superimposition of the soft and hard tissue models.ConclusionsThere were no significant statistical differences between the two registration methods and it was unlikely to have any clinical significance. Voxel based registration was associated with less variability. Registering on the soft tissue in isolation from the hard tissue may not be a true reflection of the surgical change.

Highlights

  • Skeletal and soft tissue changes following orthognathic surgery have been assessed in two dimensions by superimposing pre- and post-operative lateral cephalographs on stable skeletal structures such as the anterior cranial base [1,2] or by comparing linear and angular cephalometric measurements [3].The use of low dose cone beam CT scans (CBCT) has allowed capture of the skeletal and soft tissues in three-dimensions [4,5]

  • Surface based registration showed a high variability in the mean distances between the corresponding surfaces compared to voxel based registration, especially for soft tissue

  • Voxel based registration and surface based registration of the hard tissues showed the same values in the absolute mean distances between the models, 0.05 (60.21) mm and 0.47 (60.26) mm respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Skeletal and soft tissue changes following orthognathic surgery have been assessed in two dimensions by superimposing pre- and post-operative lateral cephalographs on stable skeletal structures such as the anterior cranial base [1,2] or by comparing linear and angular cephalometric measurements [3]. The use of low dose cone beam CT scans (CBCT) has allowed capture of the skeletal and soft tissues in three-dimensions [4,5]. The output image volume is composed of small units called voxels, the dimensions of which depend on the selected image resolution. Each voxel has a unique grey scale value which depends on the opacity of the structure scanned in that volume [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call