Abstract
For many years values of gravity all over the world have been obtained relative to that at Potsdam by observations with invariable pendulums. The value at Potsdam was determined by Kühnen and Furtwängler (1906) by Kater’s method and a standard error of 0.003 cm./sec.2was claimed for the result. Any error in the Potsdam value would involve an equal error in the related values all over the world. As the acceleration of gravity is involved in all measurements of force with the balance and thus in the unit of electric current and in such quantities as the velocity of anα-particle, it is important to know whether the accepted value at Potsdam has the accuracy claimed for it. A recent absolute determination by Heyl and Cook (1936) at the National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., gave a result 0.020 cm./sec.2less than that obtained by comparison with Potsdam, whilst one by Clark at the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington gave 0.0138cm./sec.2less. The relative gravity connexion between Potsdam and Washington is strong, but those between Teddington and Washington and between Teddington and Potsdam are weak and indirect. Advantage has therefore been taken of the visit of the authors to Washington to attend the recent meeting of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics to make a comparison of the values ofgat the places used for the absolute determinations at the National Physical Laboratory and at the National Bureau of Standards. It had been intended also to connect the National Physical Laboratory directly with Potsdam, but the outbreak of war has made it necessary for this to be postponed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.