Abstract
A variant of the protracted tilt test, the 10-minute supine -30-minute tilt test (10S-30TT), has been proposed by us for the evaluation of blood pressure (BP). The present investigation compares parameters of diastolic BP by 3 methods: office measurements, 10S-30TT, and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring; the last method served as a reference standard. Twenty patients presenting at the office with diastolic BP values ranging from 80 to 120 mm Hg (median 90) were studied. Statistically significant correlations were observed between the following parameters: diastolic office BP and average ambulatory awake diastolic BP (r = 0.64, p = 0.002); average tilt-test diastolic BP and average ambulatory awake diastolic BP (r = 0.69, p = 0.0006); frequency of elevated diastolic BP values during the tilt test and frequency of elevated ambulatory awake diastolic BP values (r = 0.69, p = 0.0007). Diastolic BP diagnosis scores exhibited strong correlation only between the ambulatory and tilt-test diagnosis (κ = 0.70), but not between ambulatory and office BP diagnosis (κ = 0.50). Based on the close correlation between results of the 10S-30TT and ambulatory monitoring in the evaluation of diastolic BP, we suggest that the faster and cheaper tilt test may serve as a substitute in certain categories of patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.