Abstract
We have compared a commercially available tablet diffusion method for the In Vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole (FCZ) and voriconazole (VCZ) with the disk diffusion method M44 (CLSI) with 282 clinical yeast isolates. The superior stability of antifungal agents in tablets can explain the differences for each category of susceptibility by both methods.Neo-Sensitabs™ tablets antifungal susceptibility testing showed an excellent correlation (0.98 for FCZ and 0.98 for VCZ at 24h and 0.96 for FCZ and 0.94 for VCZ at 48h), a reduced percentage of disagreements (4.6% and 8.2% for FCZ at 24h and 48h respectively; 1.1% and 2.1% for VCZ at 24h and 48h respectively) and the absence of statistically significant difference in comparison with the reference protocol for performing antifungal susceptibility testing with the agar diffusion method.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
