Comparison of survival outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with standard chemoradiation in and outside of clinical trials.

Abstract

2051 Background: Randomized clinical trials use stringent eligibility criteria to select patients which can raise concerns about generalizability of study results. Recent interest in external controls and new trial designs has increasingly focused on the possible use of real-world data sources. We examined potential differences of survival outcomes in clinical trial and real-world datasets in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: Patient-level data from 4 independent datasets were analyzed. Non-trial data were derived from an institutional dataset of 453 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated outside of a clinical trial with standard radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide at a large academic center. Trial patients included patients on the control arm of several multi-institutional trials (NCT00689221, n = 273; NCT00813943, n = 89; NCT00943826; n = 459) and patients treated on trial at our institution (n = 210). Non-trial patients were compared with each of the 4 clinical trial datasets in pairwise comparisons with Cox regression with adjustments for age, sex, extent of resection, KPS and MGMT status. Results: Patient-level data from 1,484 patients were analyzed. Non-trial patients were older compared to patients in the multi-institutional trials (mean 58.6 vs. 56.1 years (NCT00943826), 53.9 years (NCT00813943), 55.7 years (NCT00689221); p < = 0.001). The non-trial cohort had fewer women (43.5% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.02), greater proportion of lower KPS patients (47% KPS <90 vs. 31% KPS <90, p < 0.001) and greater proportion of MGMT methylated patients (49% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) compared to NCT00943826 patients. There were no other significant differences between patient characteristics of non-trial patients and the 4 trial datasets. Trial participation was not associated with improved survival in multivariable analysis after adjustments for clinical covariates (non-trial patients vs. each trial dataset; Table, P > 0.05). Conclusions: Glioblastoma patients treated on multi-institutional clinical trials that were included in our analysis did not have statistically significant differences in survival compared to patients treated outside of a clinical trial at a large academic center after adjustment for relevant variables. Our findings support the possible use of real-world data in the development of external control arms for future trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. [Table: see text]