Abstract

BackgroundThe study compared the surgical dose-response relationship for divergence insufficiency esotropia (DIE) and non-accommodative esotropia without divergence insufficiency (non-DIE).MethodsWe carried out a retrospective review of a group of patients with DIE and non-DIE who underwent recession surgery of the medial rectus muscle in both eyes. Linear regression analysis compared surgical dose–response between the two groups.ResultsIn the 15 patients with DIE, the mean preoperative ocular deviation at distant fixation was 25 prism diopters (PD), compared with 3 PD postoperatively. In the 38 non-DIE patients, the mean preoperative ocular deviation was 28 PD, compared with 3 PD postoperatively. The average surgical dose–response was 1.56 PD/mm in the DIE group and 2.91 PD/mm in the non-DIE group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsSurgical dose–response was significantly lower in DIE patients than in non-DIE patients. Augmented MR recession surgery could be regarded as an effective treatment option for patients with DIE. Further study with a larger sample and long-term follow-up is needed to seek the proper extent of surgery in these patients.

Highlights

  • Surgical dose–response was significantly lower in Divergence insufficiency esotropia (DIE) patients than in non-DIE patients

  • Augmented medial rectus (MR) recession surgery could be regarded as an effective treatment option for patients with DIE

  • Divergence insufficiency esotropia (DIE), originally described by Duane in 1896, is an acquired condition characterized by an esodeviation that measures at least 10 prism diopters (PD) greater at distant rather than near fixation [1]

Read more

Summary

Results

In the 15 patients with DIE, the mean preoperative ocular deviation at distant fixation was 25 prism diopters (PD), compared with 3 PD postoperatively. In the 38 non-DIE patients, the mean preoperative ocular deviation was 28 PD, compared with 3 PD postoperatively. The average surgical dose–response was 1.56 PD/mm in the DIE group and 2.91 PD/mm in the non-DIE group (p < 0.001)

Conclusions
Introduction
20 PD 25 PD 30 PD 40 PD 50 PD 60 PD
18 PD 20–24 PD 25 PD 30 PD 35 PD 40 PD 45 PD 50 PD 60 PD
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call