COMPARISON OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES AND BAYESIAN NEURAL NETWORKS PERFORMANCE FOR BREAST TISSUES USING GEOSTATISTICAL FUNCTIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES

Abstract

Female breast cancer is a major cause of deaths in occidental countries. Computer-aided Detection (CAD) systems can aid radiologists to increase diagnostic accuracy. In this work, we present a comparison between two classifiers applied to the separation of normal and abnormal breast tissues from mammograms. The purpose of the comparison is to select the best prediction technique to be part of a CAD system. Each region of interest is classified through a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) as normal or abnormal region. SVM is a machine-learning method, based on the principle of structural risk minimization, which shows good performance when applied to data outside the training set. A Bayesian Neural Network is a classifier that joins traditional neural networks theory and Bayesian inference. We use a set of measures obtained by the application of the semivariogram, semimadogram, covariogram, and correlogram functions to the characterization of breast tissue as normal or abnormal. The results show that SVM presents best performance for the classification of breast tissues in mammographic images. The tests indicate that SVM has more generalization power than the BNN classifier. BNN has a sensibility of 76.19% and a specificity of 79.31%, while SVM presents a sensibility of 74.07% and a specificity of 98.77%. The accuracy rate for tests is 78.70% and 92.59% for BNN and SVM, respectively.