Comparison of Subsequent Inframalleolar Bypass Surgery and Repeat Endovascular Therapy for Infrapopliteal Restenosis in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Primary Endovascular Therapy.

Abstract

Although endovascular therapy (EVT) is considered a vital strategy for treating infrapopliteal lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the recurrence rate after EVT exceeds that after bypass surgery (BSX). The optimal approach for managing infrapopliteal lesion recurrence in patients with CLTI and unhealed ulcers remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repeat EVT and subsequent inframalleolar BSX for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 140 patients with CLTI (mean age, 70±10 years; male, 71.4%; diabetes mellitus, 73.6%; dialysis, 74.3%; Rutherford 5, 79.3%; and Rutherford 6, 20.7%) who had an unhealed wound due to the recurrence of infrapopliteal lesions between January 2015 and May 2020. We compared the clinical outcomes of 40 patients who underwent the subsequent inframalleolar BSX with those of 100 patients who underwent repeat EVT. The outcome measures were amputation-free survival (AFS) and wound healing rate. Propensity score matching analysis was conducted to minimize differences in baseline characteristics. Propensity score matching extracted 38 pairs (38 patients in the subsequent BSX group and 83 patients in the repeat EVT group). AFS was not significantly different between the repeat EVT and subsequent BSX groups (81.9% vs 82.6% at 1 year, p=0.97). Neither was cumulative wound healing (42.8% vs 43.3% at 1 year, p=0.55). No baseline characteristics had any significant interaction effect on the association between repeat EVT, subsequent BSX, and failure of AFS. This study using propensity score matching revealed that the clinical outcomes following repeat EVT were comparable with those following subsequent inframalleolar BSX, indicating that repeat EVT may be a viable treatment option for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence. Although endovascular therapy (EVT) has expanded the treatment options for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the recurrence rate after EVT is higher than that after bypass surgery (BSX). This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of repeat EVT with those of subsequent BSX for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence. After propensity score matching, amputation-free survival (AFS) was not significantly different between the repeat EVT and subsequent BSX groups (81.9% vs 82.6% at 1 year, p=0.97). Neither was cumulative wound healing (42.8% vs 43.3% at 1 year, p=0.55). There was no difference between the 2 revascularization strategies when treating infrapopliteal restenosis lesions.