Comparison of Structure, Morphology, and Properties of Miktoarms Star Styrene-Butadiene Rubber and Star-Shaped Styrene-Butadiene Rubbe/Polybutadiene Rubber Blends

Abstract

Four miktoarms star-shaped polybutadiene-Sn-poly(styrene-butadiene) rubber (MSS-PB-PSBR) with 1,1-diphenylhexyl at the ends of the arms were prepared by two different coupling techniques. One technique was a one-step technology, from which two miktoarms star styrene-butadiene rubbers, called AMSS-PB-PSBR, were obtained in which the four arm stars had varying ratios of PB:PSBR arms; another was a two-step technology, from which another two miktoarms star styrene-butadiene rubbers, called BMSS-PB-PSBR, were obtained in which all consisted of PB-Sn-(PSBR)3 stars. The molecular structure parameters and morphology-properties of the four MSS-PB-PSBR were determined and studied, and compared with that of a star-shaped styrene-butadiene rubber (S-SSBR)/poly butadiene rubber (PBR) blend. The results showed that the total coupling efficiency (the ratio of the total number of polymer chains (arms) coupled by SnCl4 to that of the total number of polymer chains) of the MSS-PB-PSBR was higher than 60%. However, the coupling efficiency of the polybutadiene arms of BMSS-PB-PSBR was obviously higher than that of the AMSS-PB-PSBR. Compared with the S-SSBR/PBR blend, MSS-PB-PSBR had a more uniform distribution of the PB phase and a smaller phase size of PB. It was found that MSS-PB-PSBR composites filled with carbon black (CB) had a lower Payne effect than the S-SSBR/PBR/CB composite, with the BMSS-PB-PSBR/CB composites being especially lower. The BMSS-PB-PSBR/CB composites had higher mechanical properties and lower rolling resistance than the AMSS-PB-PSBR/CB composites due to the high coupling efficiency of the polybutadiene arms; the results indicated that the two-step technology was better than the one-step technology for preparing the tread material of “green” tires.