Abstract

Abstract. A new framework is proposed for the evaluation of stochastic subgrid-scale parameterizations in the context of the Modular Arbitrary-Order Ocean-Atmosphere Model (MAOOAM), a coupled ocean–atmosphere model of intermediate complexity. Two physically based parameterizations are investigated – the first one based on the singular perturbation of Markov operators, also known as homogenization. The second one is a recently proposed parameterization based on Ruelle's response theory. The two parameterizations are implemented in a rigorous way, assuming however that the unresolved-scale relevant statistics are Gaussian. They are extensively tested for a low-order version known to exhibit low-frequency variability (LFV), and some preliminary results are obtained for an intermediate-order version. Several different configurations of the resolved–unresolved-scale separations are then considered. Both parameterizations show remarkable performances in correcting the impact of model errors, being even able to change the modality of the probability distributions. Their respective limitations are also discussed.

Highlights

  • Climate models are not perfect, as they cannot encompass the whole world in their description

  • It raises the question about the mechanism of this rather drastic modification: is it the noise that changes the dynamics or does the noise trigger and shift a bifurcation of the unresolved system, which induces the change in modality? To give some insight about this latter possibility, we considered the noLFV parameter set and increased the ocean– atmosphere wind stress coupling parameter d to 5 × 10−9

  • We have introduced a new framework to test different stochastic parameterization methods in the context of the ocean–atmosphere coupled model Modular Arbitrary-Order Ocean-Atmosphere Model (MAOOAM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate models are not perfect, as they cannot encompass the whole world in their description. A revival of interest in stochastic parameterization methods for climate systems has occurred, due to the availability of new mathematical methods to perform the reduction of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) systems: either based on the conditional averaging (Kifer, 2001; Arnold, 2001; Arnold et al, 2003), on the singular perturbation theory of Markov processes (Majda et al, 2001) (MTV, Majda–Timofeyev–Vanden-Eijnden), on the conditional Markov chain (Crommelin and Vanden-Eijnden, 2008), or on Ruelle’s response theory (Wouters and Lucarini, 2012) and non-Markovian reduced stochastic equations (Chekroun et al, 2014, 2015) These methods have all in common a rigorous mathematical framework. One may ask the question of the influence of the fast atmospheric processes on the slower atmospheric modes as well as on the very slow ocean This problem was already addressed by the authors in Demaeyer and Vannitsem (2017) for a particular decomposition of the atmospheric modes based on the existence of an underlying invariant manifold.

The MAOOAM model
Model decompositions and parameterizations
Stochastic parameterizations
Model decompositions
Decomposition of the resolved component tendencies
Decompositions of the unresolved component tendencies
Noisy model
Results
The 36-variable VDDG model version
Parameterization based on the invariant manifold
Parameterization of the wavenumber 2 atmospheric variables
Parameterization of the wavenumber 2 atmospheric baroclinic variables
The parameterization of the atmospheric wavenumber 2 and F4 modes
Conclusions
Brief sketch of the parameterization derivation
Practical implementation
The M1 term
Technical details
The M2 term
The M3 term
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call