Abstract
This paper compares contemporary and historical light water reactor shielding and pressure vessel dosimetry cross-section libraries for a pressurized water reactor calculational benchmark problem with a standard out-in core loading. The calculational benchmark problem was developed at Brookhaven National Laboratory by the request of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and used the Oak Ridge National Laboratory two-dimensional discrete ordinates code DORT and the BUGLE-93 cross-section library for the calculations. In this paper, a Westinghouse three-dimensional discrete ordinates code with parallel processing, the RAPTOR-M3G code was used. A variety of cross section libraries were used with RAPTOR-M3G including the BUGLE-93, BUGLE-96, and BUGLE-B7 cross-section libraries developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the broad-group ALPAN-VII.0 cross-section library developed at Westinghouse. In comparing the calculation-to-calculation reaction rates using the BUGLE-93 cross-section library at the thermal shield, pressure vessel, and cavity capsules, for eleven dosimetry reaction rates, a maximum relative difference of 5% was observed, with the exception of 65 Cu(n,2n) in the pressure vessel capsule that had a 90% relative difference with respect to the reference results. It is thought that the 65 Cu(n,2n) reaction rate reported in the reference for the pressure vessel capsule is not correct. In considering the libraries developed after BUGLE-93, a maximum relative difference of 12% was observed in reaction rates, with respect to the reference results, for 237 Np(n,f) in the cavity capsule using BUGLE-B7.
Highlights
This paper documents radiation transport calculation results using the Westinghouse-developed RApid Parallel Transport Of Radiation – Multiple 3-D Geometries (RAPTOR-M3G) code version 2.0 [1] with Oak Ridge National Laboratory-developed Broad User Group Library ENDF/B-93 (BUGLE-93) [2], BUGLE-96 [3], BUGLE-B7 [4], and A Library for Photons And Neutrons with ENDF/B-VII.0 (ALPAN-VII.0) [5], for the U
A variety of cross section libraries were used with RAPTOR-M3G including the BUGLE-93, BUGLE-96, and BUGLE-B7 cross-section libraries developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the broad-group ALPAN-VII.0 cross-section library developed at Westinghouse
In considering the libraries developed after BUGLE93, a maximum relative difference of 12% was observed in reaction rates, with respect to the reference results, for 237Np(n,f) in the cavity capsule using BUGLE-B7
Summary
This paper documents radiation transport calculation results using the Westinghouse-developed RApid Parallel Transport Of Radiation – Multiple 3-D Geometries (RAPTOR-M3G) code version 2.0 [1] with Oak Ridge National Laboratory-developed Broad User Group Library ENDF/B-93 (BUGLE-93) [2], BUGLE-96 [3], BUGLE-B7 [4], and A Library for Photons And Neutrons with ENDF/B-VII.0 (ALPAN-VII.0) [5], for the U. The BUGLE-93 and BUGLE-96 libraries were developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and contain a coupled 47-neutron, 20-gamma-ray group cross-section library for light water reactor shielding and pressure vessel dosimetry applications derived from ENDF/B-VI. and ENDF/B-VI.3 [7], respectively. Reference 6 provides results of the USNRC benchmark problems calculated using the ORNL twodimensional (2-D) discrete ordinates code DORT version 2.8.14 to perform a 2-D/one-dimensional (1-D) flux synthesis and using the BUGLE-93 cross-section library. MCNP Monte Carlo calculations were performed for the PWR SCL and PLSA core loading to validate the flux synthesis results. Note that the geometric description of the three benchmark cases listed above is the same; the geometry developed in this work can be used for the LLCL and PLSA core loading benchmarks in the future
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.