Comparison of sputum specimens and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for diagnosis of acute human metapneumovirus-related lower respiratory tract infections in adults.

Abstract

To detect human metapneumovirus, tests besides reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on nasopharyngeal swab specimens are less accessible. Immunochromatography assays are rapid and simple without the need of any special equipment but sometimes are insufficiently sensitive. This study describes the usefulness of immunochromatography assays to detect human metapneumovirus in adult patients with human metapneumovirus-related acute lower respiratory tract infection using sputum specimens. This prospective single-center study enrolled adults and adolescents aged ≥16 years with signs and symptoms of an acute respiratory illness who were diagnosed with acute lower respiratory tract infection. The presence of human metapneumovirus infection was confirmed by seroconversion. Immunochromatography assays and real-time RT-PCR were performed to compare the efficacy of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and sputum specimens. Comparative results were obtained via McNemar's test. Overall, 337 patients were recruited in this study; 63 (18.7%) patients were seroconverted. Sputum specimens showed significantly higher positivity rates than nasopharyngeal swab specimens with both immunochromatography assays (p=0.0008) and real-time RT-PCR (p=0.014). Among 29 patients with pneumonia who had concordant positive real-time RT-PCR results for both nasopharyngeal swab specimens and sputum specimens, 21 (72.4%) had a higher viral load in the sputum specimens. Sputum specimens are more useful in detecting human metapneumovirus than nasopharyngeal swab specimens in adult patients with acute lower respiratory tract infection.