Abstract
We compared peak circumferential strain (Ecc) values with spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM) and strain-encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 3 tesla. Correlation coefficients of the averaged peak Ecc values of the 2 methods were statistically significant. However, the average peak Ecc value was significantly lower with SPAMM (-13.5%±3.3%) than with SENC (-21.6%±3.4%) (P<0.0001). The SENC method showed higher circumferential strain than the SPAMM method at 3T.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
