Abstract
Te use of photogrammetry and laser scanners has become the standard method of documenting 3D. Based on existing research, it is known that laser scanners have the advantage of producing geometric data, while photogrammetry has the advantage of producing texture data. However, the high price of laser scanners has become a factor that hinders the practice of documentation, especially for institutions and individuals with limited funds. Tis encourages the development of digital photogrammetry using DSLR cameras as standard instruments. Te digital camera technology continues to develop until the integration of cameras on smartphones today. Te quality of today’s smartphone cameras has the potential to be used in photogrammetry as an alternative method of 3D documenting with an afordable cost and ease of use compared to DSLR cameras. Unfortunately, there is still little research on smartphone-based photogrammetry, and the quality of the data generated from these tools is not yet clear. In this study, an experiment was conducted to explore the comparison of the quality of smartphone cameras and DSLR cameras. Te experimental results show that the use of a smartphone camera produces data of the same quality as a DSLR camera and can be used as an alternative method of 3D documentation. Keywords: 3D documentation; 3D recording; digital photogrammetry; photogrammetry; smartphone; cultural preservation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
