Comparison of sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and everolimus-eluting stent in unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

ObjectivesThis retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with different types of drug-eluting stents (DES). BackgroundThe standard of care for patients with ULMCA is coronary artery bypass surgery. However, current guidelines recommend PCI in clinical conditions where there is an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes. Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ULMCA PCI with different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) are unknown. MethodsData from a multicenter international registry, which included 239 consecutive patients from four institutions who ULMCA PCI with DES, were collected. ResultsThere were 42 patients receiving paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), 158 patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), and 39 patients receiving everolimus-eluting stent (EES). There was no statistical difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis among PES, SES, and EES at 30days and 1year. ConclusionsThere are no differences in clinical events among patients receiving PES, SES, and EES for ULMCA disease.