Comparison of single trough-based area under the concentration–time curve versus trough concentration for the incidence of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity

Abstract

IntroductionWhile the revised 2020 consensus guideline recommends the use of area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)-guided vancomycin monitoring, collecting multiple vancomycin serum samples to calculate the AUC may cause clinical complications. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate whether AUC-guided vancomycin monitoring, in which AUC was calculated based on a single trough concentration, is a better predictor of nephrotoxicity than trough-guided monitoring in patients receiving vancomycin therapy. MethodsA single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at the 614-bed Gifu University Hospital in Japan. Patients who received intravenous vancomycin for a documented or suspected infection and had their serum vancomycin trough concentration monitored between October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2020 were enrolled in the present study. ResultsMultivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that AUC (>600 μg•h/mL) was a significant risk factor for the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), while trough concentration (≥15 μg/mL) was not. Moreover, the AUC (>600 μg•h/mL) showed higher specificity and similar sensitivity to the trough concentration (≥15 μg/mL). Kaplan-Meier plots of the cumulative incidence of the AKI-free rate in patients indicated that the onset of AKI was significantly longer in patients with AUC ≤600 μg•h/mL than in patients with AUC >600 μg•h/mL (HR, 16.1; 95% CI, 6.3–41.2; p < 0.001). ConclusionAUC based on a single trough concentration was a better predictor of nephrotoxicity than trough concentration.