Abstract
ncRNAs functions in the cells has produced exponentially increasing data of RNA 3D structures in both PDB and NDB. Tools are needed to search for similar RNA 3D structures in hope to aid with annotation processes. In this article, five tools (ARTS, FASTR3D, RNA FRABASE 2.0, RAG-3D, and R3D-BLAST2) will be compared based on their performances in analyzing samples of RNA 3D structures in different sizes (pseudoknot, 5S rRNA, and 18S rRNA). ARTS was found to be the most outdated and slow tools, while FASTR3D and RNA FRABASE 2.0 is commonly used as a benchmarking standard. RAG-3D & R3D-BLAST2 produces results with the highest accuracy and is still relevant in the present, however, RAG-3D is found to be limited to analyze RNA 3D structures to a certain size (it cannot process very large samples). This article also provides suggestion for future studies to create tools with similar purposes.
Paper version not known (
Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
