Abstract

AbstractDrought monitoring is an essential component of drought risk management. It is normally performed using various drought indices that are effectively continuous functions of rainfall and other hydrometeorological variables. A number of drought indices have been introduced and applied in different countries to date. This paper compares the performance of seven indices for drought monitoring in the Tehran province of Iran. The indices used include deciles index (DI), percent of normal (PN), standard precipitation index (SPI), China‐Z index (CZI), modified CZI (MCZI), Z‐Score and effective drought index (EDI). The comparison of indices is based on drought cases and classes that were detected in the province over the 32 years of data, as well as over the latest 1998–2001 drought spell. The results show that SPI, CZI and Z‐Score perform similarly with regard to drought identification and respond slowly to drought onset. DI appears to be very responsive to rainfall events of a particular year, but it has inconsistent spatial and temporal variation. The SPI and EDI were found to be able to detect the onset of drought, its spatial and temporal variation consistently, and it may be recommended for operational drought monitoring in the Province. However, the EDI was found to be more responsive to the emerging drought and performed better. Copyright © 2006 Royal Meteorological Society

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call