Abstract
BackgroundWhile doxycycline is recommended as an alternative treatment of syphilis in patients with penicillin allergy or intolerance, clinical studies to compare serological response to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin in treatment of early syphilis among HIV-infected patients remain sparse.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of HIV-infected patients with early syphilis who received doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 14 days (doxycycline group) and those who received 1 dose of benzathine penicillin (2.4 million units) (penicillin group) between 2007 and 2013. Serological responses defined as a decline of rapid plasma reagin titer by 4-fold or greater at 6 and 12 months of treatment were compared between the two groups.ResultsDuring the study period, 123 and 271 patients in the doxycycline and penicillin group, respectively, completed 6 months or longer follow-up. Ninety-one and 271 patients in the doxycycline and penicillin group, respectively, completed 12 months or longer follow-up. Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups, except that, compared with penicillin group, doxycycline group had a lower proportion of patients with secondary syphilis (65.4% versus 41.5%, P<0.0001) and a higher proportion of patients with early latent syphilis (25.3% versus 49.6%, P<0.0001). No statistically significant differences were found in the serological response rates to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin at 6 months (63.4% versus 72.3%, P = 0.075) and 12 months of treatment (65.9% versus 68.3%, P = 0.681). In multivariate analysis, secondary syphilis, but not treatment regimen, was consistently associated with serological response at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.ConclusionsThe serological response rates to a 14-day course of doxycycline and a single dose of benzathine penicillin were similar in HIV-infected patients with early syphilis at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Patients with secondary syphilis were more likely to achieve serological response than those with other stages.
Highlights
According to the WHO estimate, there were 36.4 million cases of syphilis globally in adults aged between 15 and 49 years in 2008 [1]
According to the treatment guidelines for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [15] and UK national guidelines on the management of syphilis [16], benzathine penicillin is the treatment of the choice for syphilis and one dose of benzathine penicillin (2.4 million units [MU]) administered intramuscularly is recommended for HIVinfected and HIV-uninfected patients with early syphilis
We reviewed the medical records of the HIV-infected patients aged 20 years or greater, who presented with early syphilis and received a 14-day treatment course of doxycycline or a single dose of benzathine penicillin (2.4 MU) at the participating hospitals from January 2007 to August 2013
Summary
According to the WHO estimate, there were 36.4 million cases of syphilis globally in adults aged between 15 and 49 years in 2008 [1]. According to the treatment guidelines for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [15] and UK national guidelines on the management of syphilis [16], benzathine penicillin is the treatment of the choice for syphilis and one dose of benzathine penicillin (2.4 million units [MU]) administered intramuscularly is recommended for HIVinfected and HIV-uninfected patients with early syphilis (primary, secondary, and early latent syphilis). We aimed to compare the serological response rates of early syphilis to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin among HIV-infected patients by following the STDs treatment guidelines [15,16,21]. While doxycycline is recommended as an alternative treatment of syphilis in patients with penicillin allergy or intolerance, clinical studies to compare serological response to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin in treatment of early syphilis among HIV-infected patients remain sparse
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.