Abstract

Abstract. After air strikes on July 14 and 15, 2006 the Jiyeh Power Station started leaking oil into the eastern Mediterranean Sea. The power station is located about 30 km south of Beirut and the slick covered about 170 km of coastline threatening the neighboring countries Turkey and Cyprus. Due to the ongoing conflict between Israel and Lebanon, cleaning efforts could not start immediately resulting in 12 000 to 15 000 tons of fuel oil leaking into the sea. In this paper we compare results from automatic and semi-automatic slick detection algorithms. The automatic detection method combines the probabilities calculated for each pixel from each image to obtain a joint probability, minimizing the adverse effects of atmosphere on oil spill detection. The method can readily utilize X-, C- and L-band data where available. Furthermore wind and wave speed observations can be used for a more accurate analysis. For this study, we utilize Envisat ASAR ScanSAR data. A probability map is generated based on the radar backscatter, effect of wind and dampening value. The semi-automatic algorithm is based on supervised classification. As a classifier, Artificial Neural Network Multilayer Perceptron (ANN MLP) classifier is used since it is more flexible and efficient than conventional maximum likelihood classifier for multisource and multi-temporal data. The learning algorithm for ANN MLP is chosen as the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM). Training and test data for supervised classification are composed from the textural information created from SAR images. This approach is semiautomatic because tuning the parameters of classifier and composing training data need a human interaction. We point out the similarities and differences between the two methods and their results as well as underlining their advantages and disadvantages. Due to the lack of ground truth data, we compare obtained results to each other, as well as other published oil slick area assessments.

Highlights

  • Oil spills pose a threat to any nation that borders a body of water

  • The intensity of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images depends on the surface roughness, which is altered in the event of an oil spill

  • In this paper we propose a fully automatic oil spill monitoring system that is capable of combining data from multiple SAR images

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oil spills pose a threat to any nation that borders a body of water. Economical and environmental losses due to an oil spill are proportional to the volume of spill, and cause devastating consequences for the environment regardless of size. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) systems provide a viable option for oil slick monitoring. The intensity of SAR images depends on the surface roughness, which is altered in the event of an oil spill. Oil covering an ocean surface dampens surface waves, causing specular reflection of the radar wave. This results in reduced backscatter energy returning to the satellite. It is important, to have some wind to produce surface waves. Since SAR systems have a limited range of ideal wind speed and direction where they are most sensitive, they do not perform well for oil spill detection under very windy or very calm conditions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call