Comparison of Selective vs Empiric Pharmacologic Preventive Therapy of Kidney Stone Recurrence With High-Risk Features

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the frequency of stone-related events among subgroups of high-risk patients with and without 24-hour urine testing before preventive pharmacological therapy (PPT) prescription. While recent studies show, on average, no benefit to a selective approach to PPT for urinary stone disease (USD), there could be heterogeneity in treatment effect across patient subgroups. Materials and MethodsUsing medical claims data from working-age adults and their dependents with USD (2008-2019), we identified those with a prescription fill for a PPT agent (thiazide diuretic, alkali therapy, or allopurinol). We then stratified patients into subgroups based on the presence of a concomitant condition or other factors that raised their stone recurrence risk. Finally, we fit multivariable regression models to measure the association between stone-related events (emergency department visit, hospitalization, and surgery) and 24-hour urine testing before PPT prescription by high-risk subgroup. ResultsOverall, 8369 adults with USD had a concomitant condition that raised their recurrence risk. Thirty-three percent (n = 2722) of these patients were prescribed PPT after 24-hour urine testing (median follow-up, 590 days), and 67% (n = 5647) received PPT empirically (median follow-up, 533 days). Compared to patients treated empirically, those with a history of recurrent USD had a significantly lower hazard of a subsequent stone-related event if they received selective PPT (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.96). No significant associations were noted for selective PPT in the other high-risk subgroups. ConclusionPatients with a history of recurrent USD benefit from PPT when guided by findings from 24-hour urine testing.