Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of anti-rotation trochanteric nails (ATNs) with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients. In total, 165 intertrochanteric fractures were treated between January 2007 and January 2010. One hundred forty patients were included. The operation time, amount of blood loss, fluoroscopy screening time, and length of hospitalization were recorded. The radiological position of the implant, quality of fracture reduction, and tip-apex distance were evaluated, and the postoperative complications as well as functional condition of the patients were assessed. There were no significant differences between the ATN and PFNA groups for the presence of general complications, length of hospitalization, and functional capacity. The mean operation time, blood loss amount, and fluoroscopy screening time were more in the ATN group than in the PFNA group. Reoperation was needed for nine and two patients in the ATN and PFNA groups, respectively, because of implant-related complications. Both ATNs and PFNA were suitable for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures, but the risk of complication occurrence and need for reoperation were found to be higher in patients who were treated with ATNs.
Highlights
Pertrochanteric fractures are common seen in elderly patients, and the incidence of these fractures is expected to increase [1,2,3,4]
There were no significant differences between the anti-rotation trochanteric nails (ATNs) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) groups for the presence of general complications, length of hospitalization, and functional capacity
The mean operation time, blood loss amount, and fluoroscopy screening time were more in the ATN group than in the PFNA group
Summary
Pertrochanteric fractures are common seen in elderly patients, and the incidence of these fractures is expected to increase [1,2,3,4]. Dynamic hip screw systems provide stable fixation with low major complication rates [5]. High failure rates with the usage of these implants for unstable fracture types have been reported [6,7,8]. A gamma nail was a prototype of cephalomedullary devices. Complications such as cut-out, implant breakage, femoral shaft fractures, and reduction loss have been reported with the use of this device [1, 9]. To overcome these kinds of mechanical complications, new designs such
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
