Comparison of robotic-assisted and open radical cystectomy in a community-based, non-tertiary health care setting.

Abstract

We examined the safety and feasibility of transitioning from open radical cystectomies to robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomies in a community-based, non-tertiary health care setting. A retrospective review and analysis of our most recent 14 unselected consecutive patients who underwent open cystectomy was compared to our first 14 unselected consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy. Perioperative and pathologic outcomes were reviewed to determine the safety and oncologic equivalence of the two procedures. From 2003 to 2010, 14 consecutive patients underwent an open cystectomy and from 2010 to 2012 another 14 consecutive patients underwent a robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy. The operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group (6h 23min vs. 4h 28min; p<0.05) and intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower compared with the open radical cystectomy (ORC) group (470ml vs. 942ml; p<0.05). Regarding complications, 21% of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) patients experienced major complications versus 14% of ORC patients. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates or length of hospital stay between the ORC and RARC groups. No pathologic differences were noted between the two groups and lymph node counts were similar in the two groups, with the median numbers being 11.9 and 9.5 in RARC and ORC, respectively. RARC can be accomplished in a community-based, non-tertiary health care setting without compromising perioperative or pathologic outcomes during the institution of this minimally invasive procedure.