Comparison of Retroauricular and Reverse Question Mark Incisions for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy

Abstract

The retroauricular (RA) incision has several theoretical benefits compared with the reverse question mark (RQM) incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC), but limited data comparing the 2 exist. Consecutive patients who underwent DHC between 2016 and 2022 and survived ≥30 days at a single institution were included. The primary outcome was wound complication within 30 days (30dWC) requiring reoperation. Secondary outcomes included 90-day wound complication (90dWC), craniectomy size in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior dimensions, distance from the inferior craniectomy margin to the middle cranial fossa (MCF), estimated blood loss (EBL), and operative duration. Multivariate analyses were performed for each outcome. A total of 110 patients (RA group: 27, RQM group: 83) were included. The incidence of 30dWC was 1.2% and 0 in the RQM and RA groups, respectively. The incidence of 90dWC was 2.4% and 3.7% in the RQM and RA groups, respectively. There was no difference in mean AP size (RQM: 15 cm, RA: 14.4 cm; P= 0.18), superior-inferior size (RQM: 11.8 cm, RA: 11.9 cm; P= 0.92), and distance from MCF (RQM: 15.4 mm, RA: 18 mm; P= 0.18). Mean EBL (RQM: 418 mL, RA: 314 mL; P= 0.36) and operative duration (RQM: 103 min, RA: 89 min; P= 0.14) were similar. There was no difference in cranioplasty wound complications, EBL, or operative duration. Wound complications are comparable between the RQM and RA incisions. The RA incision does not compromise craniectomy size or temporal bone removal.