Abstract

In this paper, we study the estimation of the effective number of relativistic species from a combination of cosmic microwave background (CMB) and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data. We vary different ingredients of the analysis: the Planck high-ℓ likelihoods, the Boltzmann solvers, and the statistical approaches. The variation of the inferred values gives an indication of an additional systematic uncertainty, which is of the same order of magnitude as the error derived from each individual likelihood. We show that this systematic uncertainty is essentially associated to the assumptions made in the high-ℓ likelihood implementations, in particular for the foreground residuals modellings. We also compare a subset of likelihoods using only the TE power spectra, expected to be less sensitive to foreground residuals.

Highlights

  • The expansion rate in the early universe depends on the energy density of relativistic particles, which is parameterised by Neff, the effective number of relativistic species or degrees of freedom

  • We have studied in detail the estimation of the effective number of relativistic species from cosmic microwave background (CMB) Planck data

  • – If we can safely neglect the impact of the covariance matrix estimation, as suggested by the obtained results, the variation linked to the assumptions on foreground residuals modelling derived from the comparison of the high- likelihoods has been estimated to be of the order of ∆Neff = 0.17, of which a small part may be attributed to a statistical effect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neff relates the radiation (Ωrad) and the photon (Ωγ) energy densities relative to the critical density through: Ωrad. Under the assumption that only photons and standard light neutrinos contribute to the radiation energy density, Neff is equal to the effective number of neutrinos: Neff 3.045. This value has been derived from the number of neutrinos constrained by the measurement of the decay width of the Z boson (Beringer 2012), and takes into account residual interactions during the electronpositron annihilation

Data sets and likelihoods
Low- likelihoods
High- likelihoods
Statistics and Boltzmann codes
Boltzmann code and sampler effects
Results
Correlations with other parameters
Statistical and nuisance error contribution
Other cosmological data
Summary
Fitting TT and TE separately
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call