Comparison of Restenosis Rate in Various Devices for Coronary Intervention: Analysis Using Vessel Diameter and Lesion Length

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the restenosis rates related to vessel diameter and lesion length among plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), cutting balloon (CB) angioplasty, Palmaz‐Schatz (PS) stems, Gianturco‐Roubin (GR) stents, and directional coronary atherectomy (DCA). In 909 consecutive successfully treated cases, target lesion dimensions were divided into diameters of ± 2.5 mm and lengths of ± 20 mm to compare the restenosis rates obtained by the individual devices. Quantitative angiographic analysis was performed before the procedure, after the procedure, and at FU angiography at a mean FU time of 6 ± 3 months. Restenosis was defined as %DS > 50 at FU angiography. Patients with acute myocardial infarction, chronic total occlusions, left main lesions, ostial as well as venous graft lesions, severe calcifications, severe coronary thrombosis, and bleeding complications were excluded. The overall restenosis rate was 32%, with the CB it was 29%, with the PS stent it was 27%, and with DCA it was 39%. Each of these restenosis rates was significantly lower than that with POBA. The overall restenosis rate with short lesions at small vessels was 35%, while CB angioplasty yielded 29%, being significantly lower compared to that obtained by POBA. The overall restenosis rate with long lesions at small vessels was 53%. With those lesions there was no significant difference among the devices. The overall restenosis rate with short lesions at large vessels was 27%, with CB angioplasty it was 24%, with the PS stent it was 22%, and with DCA it was 25%. These restenosis rates were significantly lower compared to POBA. With long lesions at large vessels, the overall restenosis rate was 44%. In this subgroup, there was again no significant difference among the devices. Our study suggests that restenosis rates with short lesions are lower after CB angioplasty, stenting, and DCA, when compared to POBA. However, in the presence of long lesions, no difference was found among the devices.