Abstract
Aims: This study was designed to analyze the requirements for clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing to explore the rationality and scientific rigor of clinical trials. Methods: The guidelines for the listing of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests were compared and the requirements for clinical trials were analyzed to find similarities and differences between China, the USA and Europe. Results: The requirements for clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests in China, the USA and Europe were consistent in terms of methods. However, differences were found in the requirements for protocol design. Conclusion: The differences in clinical trial requirements stem from regulations and the actual conditions across regions, but all clinical trials are designed to obtain valid clinical performance of products.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
