Comparison of reproductive performance by artificial insemination versus natural service sires in California dairies

Abstract

This study compared the calving to conception intervals for cows in AI pens with cows exposed to natural service sires, controlling for milk production, mastitis occurrence, parity and calving month effects. Records from 10 western United States dairy herds (mean herd size = 2058 cows) were evaluated retrospectively over an 18-month period. Eight bull breeding analysis cohorts were created (the first cohort 0–50 days in milk and the remaining cohorts at 25 days in milk intervals through 226 days). The cohorts contained non-pregnant cows that were first moved into bullpens during the described cohort period. Equal numbers of non-pregnant cows only exposed to AI during the cohort period were randomly selected from the pool of eligible non-pregnant cows. An AI cow was used only once in the data analysis, but was included in a bull breeding cohort at a later date if she remained non-pregnant and was transferred to a bullpen. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was used to compare the calving to conception intervals. Cows in AI groups had higher hazard rates for pregnancy across all cohorts. Parity and milk production were significantly associated with risk for pregnancy. In herds that practice a mixture of AI and bull breeding, overall herd reproductive performance might be improved by allowing cows more opportunities at AI prior to moving them into clean-up bullpens.