Comparison of recurrence risk between patients with clinically node‐positive and ‐negative stage I non‐small cell lung cancer following surgery: A propensity score matching analysis

Abstract

BackgroundIdentifying patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at increased risk of tumor recurrence following surgery remains a major challenge. The current study aimed to compare disease‐free survival (DFS) rates after surgery between patients with clinically node‐positive (cN+) and ‐negative (cN0) stage I NSCLC.MethodsPatients with pathological stage I resected NSCLC were identified from the lung cancer database of Changhua Christian Hospital in Taiwan. Patients with clinical N status 1 or 2 and pathological N status 0 were identified as the cN+/pN0 cohort, whereas others were identified as the cN0/pN0 cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between both cohorts. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate DFS.ResultsFrom January 2010 to July 2019, 754 eligible patients were enrolled into the study, among whom 41 (5.4%) were cN+/pN0. The median follow‐up time was 43.4 months. Before PSM, the 5‐year DFS rate was 79.0% and 90.3% in cN+/pN0 and cN0/pN0 cohorts (log‐rank test, p = 0.009), respectively. After a 1:4 PSM, multivariate analysis showed that the cN+/pN0 cohort still had a poorer DFS compared to the cN0/pN0 cohort in (hazard ratio, 3.17; p = 0.040).ConclusionAmong patients with stage I resected NSCLC, cN+ patients had a worse DFS compared to cN0 patients. Surgeons should therefore consider more aggressive adjuvant therapy or frequent follow‐up in patients with surgically resected stage I NSCLC with cN+ status.