Abstract
Remimazolam, a short acting benzodiazepine, is being used for general anaesthesia. The results of studies comparing recovery after propofol with that of remimazolam are inconsistent. Given that flumazenil reverses the sedative effects of remimazolam, we hypothesised that it would speed up recovery from remimazolam general anaesthesia. The aim of this trial was to compare the speed of recovery from general anaesthesia between propofol and remimazolam reversed with flumazenil in patients undergoing minimally invasive breast surgery. Randomised, single-centre, double-blind controlled trial. A tertiary teaching hospital in South Korea from August 2022 to December 2022. Adult patients (≥19 years of age) about to undergo general anaesthesia for scheduled breast cancer surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to either the propofol or the remimazolam/flumazenil group. The emergence process was monitored by only one anaesthesiologist. The primary outcome was the time to eye opening to command during recovery from the general anaesthesia. Time to removal of the supraglottic airway (SGA) time to discharge, and the Riker sedation agitation scale (SAS) score (1 to 4) during emergence were compared as secondary outcomes. The remimazolam group had a significantly shorter mean time to eye opening than the propofol group [127 ± 51 vs. 314 ± 140 s; mean difference 187 s (95% confidence interval (CI), 133 to 241 s; P < 0.001]. The remimazolam group also had shorter times to SGA removal [169 ± 51 vs. 366 ± 149 s; mean difference 198 s (95% CI, 140 to 255 s); P < 0.001] and time to discharge from the operating room [243 ± 55 vs. 449 ± 159 s; mean difference 206 s (95% CI, 145 to 267 s); P < 0.001]. The SAS scores during emergence also differed significantly, with 1 patient in the propofol group and 25 in the remimazolam group attaining scores of 4 ( P < 0.001). Administration of remimazolam with flumazenil may be a promising option for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, providing faster recovery and better SAS scores than propofol during emergence from general anaesthesia. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05435911).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
