Comparison of recent rubber-elasticity theories with biaxial stress–strain data: the slip-link theory of Edwards and Vilgis

Abstract

The Edwards–Vilgis (EV) slip-link theory (1986) derives the elastic free energy of a rubber-like network model containing stable and sliding network junctions (crosslinks and slip-links) and predicts both low-strain softening and high-strain hardening. The four-parameter stress–strain relations calculated by the theory for geometrically different deformation modes up to high strains were tested experimentally using published biaxial stress–strain data on simple covalently crosslinked networks. For networks with low degrees of strain softening and low extensibilities, the experimental dependencies could be described rather well but, generally, a simultaneous satisfactory fit to uniaxial, pure shear and equibiaxial data was not obtained. Systematic experiment–theory deviations exceeding 10% were observed and some of the parameters had a tendency to assume values lying outside the reasonably expected range. The prediction of a pronounced maximum in the strain dependence of stress supported by slip-links seems to be a reason for the discrepancy. Also, modeling of the high-strain singularity in entropy is done in the EV theory using a rather simple approximation. As a result, the finite extensibility contribution to the stress of a slip-link-free network model becomes improbably high and significantly exceeds that following, at a given modulus and locking stretch, from the rigorously derived Langevin-statistics-based eight-chain-network elasticity theory of Arruda and Boyce.